Del Narveux
Obsidian Angels Enterprises
   |
Posted - 2007.05.13 00:29:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: SE1X
Well on the test server it looks like Concord has been made teh Uber. Cap draining concorde and drones insta gone/lost lock.
If they implement the second one, all will be well. The problem here isnt that people are ganking in highsec, its that when you do it with a particular ship concord doesnt function the way its supposed to (i.e. shutting down your firepower).
_________________
[SAK] Alumnus--And Proud Of It! -- aka Cpt Bogus
Is that my torped sig cloaking your base?
Originally by: Wrangler
Well, at least we have forum PvP..
|
Del Narveux
Obsidian Angels Enterprises
|
Posted - 2007.05.13 10:37:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Del Narveux on 13/05/2007 10:35:29
Originally by: Jim McGregor
I would use several freighters with only a few billions in each one instead of waiting for the game to solve this problem for me. I suggest you do the same.
So by your logic, nanophoons that go 5km+/sec shoudlnt have been nerfed...because theyre there? Its the same thing, dont get me wrong Im not 'anti gank' but the freighter ganking is being done using a method that bypasses the system put in place to prevent it (or make it difficult, whatever). In short, concord (or more accurately, drones not getting hit by the same pwnsauce as player ships) is not working as intended, and needs to be fixed to bring drone warfare more in line with regular guns. I dont even care if they extend concords response time or something, but if someone tries to gank someone in empire they need to get FUBARed after X seconds, drones or not.
BTW, regarding people who say concord kills shouldnt be insured, I kinda see your point but the problem there is sometimes people attack during the flag wearing off (it doesnt show on overview and stuff, has happened to me in the past) and others who exploit concord in various ways to achieve the same effect on their enemies. It would just make a mess of petitions, though maybe giving like only 75% insurance or something might be a good compromise. This would make t1 suicide BS considerably less profitable, but still I say bringing drones in line with everything else in terms of concordoken-ness is the better solution.
_________________
[SAK] Alumnus--And Proud Of It! -- aka Cpt Bogus
Is that my torped sig cloaking your base?
Originally by: Wrangler
Well, at least we have forum PvP..
|